Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > The Campfire

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 28, 2005, 07:42 PM // 19:42   #1
Chasing Dragons
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lost in La-La Land
Guild: LFGuild
Profession: Mo/Me
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Protection Warden??

I was playing UW/Fissure last night, and we had a El/Mo join us in the role of protection monk/warder. So, I was wondering if, as an ele with energy storage and not needing Divine Favor, an el/mo would make a better protector than a monk primary? Focus on Earth, Protection and Energy. You would almost be able to keep wards up continuously even in prolonged fights. And since you will not have to repeatedly cast high energy spells, your energy storage can simply get the leftover points after Earth and Protection.
dansamy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28, 2005, 08:40 PM // 20:40   #2
Site Contributor
 
Red Locust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

If you're an exclusive warder/protection, with Aegis, WaM, WaF, WaE and stuff like that, divine healing is useless to you so you might as well go ele primary for energy storage.
Red Locust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28, 2005, 08:46 PM // 20:46   #3
Desert Nomad
 
Neo-LD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Guild: [GSS][SoF][DIII]
Default

protectors usually use boon to make them able to heal and protect at the same time. boon needs divine favor.
Neo-LD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28, 2005, 08:52 PM // 20:52   #4
Site Contributor
 
Red Locust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

If he's running wards, mass enchantments and upkeep enchantments, divine healing is pretty much useless.
Red Locust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 28, 2005, 09:05 PM // 21:05   #5
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Frankly I can't imagine most protection monks running around pve doing life bond/barrier stacks.

Mo/E is clearly better than E/Mo for protection.

Any protective monk should have RoF and Prot. Spirit. RoF is really only good with decent DF and is even better with DB too. Then you'll probably want a mend and remove hex, which is also boosted by DF and boon if you run it. I personally love Sig Devo for downtimes in combat where I don't have to waste energy.

Ward against elements really isn't that good imo. The extra armor is achieved at the cost of bunching up, which is not good vs any aoe type spell and 22 armor is nothing vs spike damage if you compare it to wam's effect vs warriors. Ward against melee is great and be kept up by either setup nearly indefinitely. Ward against foes is good too but not really needed in pve. If you're running a mass enchant monk, you need DF too for blessed signet to keep energy up.
Zeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2005, 06:47 AM // 06:47   #6
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeru
Frankly I can't imagine most protection monks running around pve doing life bond/barrier stacks.

Mo/E is clearly better than E/Mo for protection.

Any protective monk should have RoF and Prot. Spirit. RoF is really only good with decent DF and is even better with DB too. Then you'll probably want a mend and remove hex, which is also boosted by DF and boon if you run it. I personally love Sig Devo for downtimes in combat where I don't have to waste energy.

Ward against elements really isn't that good imo. The extra armor is achieved at the cost of bunching up, which is not good vs any aoe type spell and 22 armor is nothing vs spike damage if you compare it to wam's effect vs warriors. Ward against melee is great and be kept up by either setup nearly indefinitely. Ward against foes is good too but not really needed in pve. If you're running a mass enchant monk, you need DF too for blessed signet to keep energy up.

First off, there is no clearly better ANYTHING. This game comes down to planning what to use and how effectively you use it.

Secondly, I've played with MANY E/Mo protection players who were insanely good. On the flip side, I've played with Mo/X who were good. There is no better class. Every fight is different, and each build has their own specialty.
funkenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2005, 08:22 AM // 08:22   #7
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Sigh

There is a large difference between optimal and suboptimal. Everything in the game is definitely not balanced, there is clear things that are better and ones that are worse. Want examples of things that are very good? Wards. AoE loses to them because of cost/recharge and there really is no other viable counter to them. For bad stuff? Look at mind wrack/wastrels worry.

Sure, there's probably some amazing user of a mindwrack/wastrels worry build out there who'd do better than a newb mesmer with an excellent build, but the fact remains his build still sucks in nearly all situations and would be better using a stronger mesmer build. The reasoning behind 'this person uses a build x and plays it amazingly well, therefore the build must be great too' is just so absurdly flawed. Player skill helps tremendously but it is not the end all.

Obviously you can make some quirky situation where some ordinarily bad setup would be useful but why not specifically say that situation? In general certain things are better than others. In general, some skills suck; that's simply the truth.
Zeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2005, 06:08 PM // 18:08   #8
Site Contributor
 
Red Locust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

If we're still taking about the protector E/Mo, divine healing is only useful if you're gonna be using spammable 5-energy spells like guardian, RoF, etc. It's great for a mo/me with channeling who goes into the fray and starts spamming all he's got.
If you're gonna be warding, using Aegis, prot. spirit, life bonding, etc. you really have no use for divine healing.
Red Locust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2005, 07:51 PM // 19:51   #9
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Completely correct.

But frankly if you're protection I can't imagine why you wouldn't spam RoF, cause that is a really good spell with DF and DB but pretty crappy without it.

An el/mo is a better pure ward spammer with ele attune or someething, but personally I think someone who only spams wards is not very flexible. WAF is nice but not all teams will really be hurt much by WAM. Protective spirit, guardian, and rof are must-haves in most protection builds imo which brings DF to the top.
Zeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony 'Rootkit' DRM disables WoW "Warden" Spyware EternalTempest Off-Topic & the Absurd 1 Nov 05, 2005 02:25 AM // 02:25
Priests of Sorrow & Summit Warden: ressurection limits? Pandora's box Explorer's League 14 Sep 20, 2005 08:11 PM // 20:11
PvP Warden Build? Vwoss The Campfire 1 Jul 13, 2005 06:26 PM // 18:26
PvE Protection Mo/Me. What do you think? M Dew The Campfire 16 Jun 09, 2005 12:44 AM // 00:44


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 PM // 13:29.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("